You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Create a free website or blog at WordPress. Ben Eastaugh and Chris Sternal-Johnson. Subscribe to feed. Home About Subscribe to feed. A a Overview Hell Around the Horn is a nautical thriller set in the last days of the great age of sail. Like this: Like Loading Follow Blog via Email Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Follow me on Twitter My Tweets. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:.
Email required Address never made public.
Author Book Signing: Rick Spilman "Hell Around the Horn"
What happened to the Jay Mariotti article. I know he isn't exactly the most liked person around, but did something happen that warranted the deletion of his article? I remember one incident it couldn't have been too long ago if i remember it where Reali muted somebody during their face time and gave the other panelist the win instead for talking about NASCAR.
- You are here:.
- THE VEILED DOCTOR.
- Hell Around the Horn by Rick Spilman.
Does anybody else recall this, and it should be added if I'm not insane. What is the source for this? Is someone updating the page after every show? As it stands, all of this info unless it's included in one of the external links, in which case, that should be noted in the article is completely unverified. Skhatri , 17 January UTC. I put the panelists into a table. If it's unliked then I'm completely fine with someone reverting it. I will go ahead and place the stats into boxes, too. Unless someone objects. Chickenmonkey , 1 February UTC.
In the "Wins by City" table, is the amount each panelist has won really neccessary? The same information can be found right above in the "All-time wins" table. Chickenmonkey , 6 February UTC. This article failed its good article nomination. This is how the article compares against the six good article criteria :. This was my first GA review, so I'm apologize if I was a little harsh.
I see above a few sections in the talk page that this was nominated to get a review, so hopefully I brought you some suggestions. Even though I pointed out a lot of things to improve, it will be more likely to pass GA with these suggestions being met. I've seen the show a couple of times, but the editors' expertise here will be able to provide details to improve the article.
Review of Hell Around the Horn by Linda Collison
Keep up the good work and just begin adding references and further expanding the article before trying again. If you have any questions let me know, and I'll try to get back to you as soon as I can. I like the look of the statistics tables at the bottom of the article, but is there any way to group some of them together so readers can look at two or three tables in a row rather than all of them on top of each other? Willbyr talk contribs , 14 March UTC. These statistics seem to be in violation of WP:OR and maintenance of them is adding far too much to the edit history.
I am going to remove them from the article and request that they not be re-added without consensus.
- Doves! Learn About Doves and Enjoy Colorful Pictures - Look and Learn! (50+ Photos of Doves).
- For Lovers of Books about Ships and the Sea;
- EL VIAJE A VILLACORONA (Spanish Edition)?
- Hell Around the Horn by Rick Spilman – gCaptain.
- Hell Around the Horn | H-Net?
- How Can I Know?: Answers to Lifes 7 Most Important Questions.
- Post navigation!
If someone does feel that this content merits inclusion, I would suggest that it be split out to another article, but I still doubt that it can pass the WP:OR standard. The section was way too long, and stretched out the article. In addition, it made maintenance difficult, because the status had to be updated in multiple locations by Panelist, by Cities, etc.
What does everyone think? Bjewiki , 19 June UTC. I started a discussion on the Talk:Running gags on Around the Horn subpage. Basically, this all looks like original research to me, and should probably just be deleted I'm open to other suggestions.
Bjewiki , 12 July UTC. I think to add the numbers every day is original research. There is no source for the numbers outside of 1,, so adding numbers every day would be un-verifiable and inaccurate. I apologize of the wording once again, don't know what I was thinking, but I still feel strongly that updating the numbers every day has a chance to be inaccurate.
What if they get off a day? Please respond here, thank you for your time. Actually, the ATH Yahoo group does have an episode list from the beginning.
Pirates and Privateers - Books by Rick Spilman
Although many don't have the day's panelists, and it hasn't been updated in a year. Mshake3 , 18 July UTC. I'd like to know what makes TV. Let's visit the entry on the Criticism of Beauroracy :. Sound familiar? PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use.
In addition to the boilerplate fair use template , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, , and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.
If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The show shows obvious large market bias and this is sometihing that should not be overlooked.